DIP88 Named Parameters, Status?

[solidstate1991]

On Saturday, 30 September 2017 at 16:22:37 UTC, Jonathan M Davis 
wrote:
>
> Effectively, all DIPs from that wiki that have not already been 
> accepted are dead, regardless of whether they stand any chance 
> of acceptance. For any DIP to be accepted, it will have to go 
> through the new DIP process, which essentially means creating a 
> new DIP.
>
> As for named parameters specifically, I'd be very surprised to 
> see them added to the language. From what I recall, Walter 
> wasn't particularly fond of the idea, and since it _is_ 
> possible to implement them with a library solution, it's 
> exactly the sort of thing that Andrei is likely to veto. At 
> this point, in general, if something can be done in the 
> language as it stands, it's not likely for it to be accepted as 
> a DIP. Now, that's dealt with on a case by case basis, so I 
> can't say for certain that a DIP for named parameters would be 
> rejected, but I would expect it to be.
>
> - Jonathan M Davis

What about DIP45, or making export an attribute? That would help 
the language to go mainstream.