that is bug?

[Patrick Schluter]

On Sunday, 8 April 2018 at 16:47:59 UTC, Patrick Schluter wrote:
> On Sunday, 8 April 2018 at 10:03:33 UTC, kdevel wrote:
>> On Sunday, 8 April 2018 at 07:22:19 UTC, Patrick Schluter 
>> wrote:
>>> [...]
>>
>> To summarize: C++ works as expected and C prevents the 
>> assigment because the conditional operator does not yield an 
>> l-value:
>
> Exactly
>
>
> Now, the only thing is to clearly define what it is in D, as 
> apparently it is neither the C++ nor the C behaviour. The old 
> precedence table on the D wiki seems to say it is like C, but 
> the example of that thread seems to show it's not.

To follow up. What's surprizing for a C guy like me is that D 
accepts without problems

    (a=1)=2;

i.e. that (a=1) is a lvalue.