that is bug?

[Patrick Schluter]

On Monday, 9 April 2018 at 14:28:54 UTC, MattCoder wrote:
> On Monday, 9 April 2018 at 03:35:07 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
>> ...
>> I don't have any problem with that part either. The following 
>> makes sense to me. I may have even used it in the past (likely 
>> in C++):
>>
>>     (cond ? a : b) = foo;
>> ...
>
> For me as a C programmer this is different. What happens in 
> this case? It will be assign foo to either a or b?
>
Except that it is not allowed in standard C. gcc says

      error: lvalue required as left operand of assignment

to that.