Migrating an existing more modern GC to D's gc.d

[Nordlöw]

On Monday, 9 April 2018 at 20:20:39 UTC, Ali wrote:
> On Monday, 9 April 2018 at 18:27:26 UTC, Per Nordlöw wrote:
>> How difficult would it be to migrate an existing modern 
>> GC-implementation into D's?
>>
>> Which kinds of GC's would be of interest?
>>
>> Which attempts have been made already?
>
> I think the priority is not having pluggable GC's, or a better 
> GC, but to fully support @nogc and deterministic and manual 
> memory management
> which as I understood is on the roadmap

Through allocators solely or will the GC adapt in some way?