Is there any hope for "lazy" and @nogc?

[Steven Schveighoffer]

On 8/1/18 3:59 AM, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
> Thank you! Finally!
> 
> Let me just state, for the record, that having *yet another* syntax 
> special case is just appalling.

The lazy variadic thing is a distinction between specifying variadic 
lazy parameters and a lazy variadic array. The distinction is so 
miniscule, but necessary to have a disambiguous syntax.

But I had actually thought for a while, that you could simply specify a 
delegate, and it would be treated as a lazy parameter, which would 
probably solve your problem. I really think this syntax should be available.

> With that said, I was hoping that specifying it explicitly as a delegate 
> would allow me to scope it. Apparently, that doesn't work :-(
> 

I guess you mean you can't scope the delegates? I'm surprised if that 
doesn't work.

-Steve