DIP 1017--Add Bottom Type--Community Review Round 1

[Arun Chandrasekaran]

On Saturday, 11 August 2018 at 05:01:50 UTC, docandrew wrote:
> On Thursday, 9 August 2018 at 15:50:02 UTC, w0rp wrote:
>> A better name for this type is `never`, which is the name of 
>> the TypeScript type with similar semantics. 
>> https://www.typescriptlang.org/docs/handbook/basic-types.html#never `nothing` is also a decent name, used in some other languages, but `never` makes it more obvious that a function never returns, and isn't as easy to confuse with `void`, which is a different kind of nothing.
>
> +1 for "never" - it's descriptive and readable.
>
> -Jon

+1 for "never"