D is dead

[Iain Buclaw]

On Thursday, 23 August 2018 at 09:29:30 UTC, Nicholas Wilson 
wrote:
> On Thursday, 23 August 2018 at 07:00:01 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:
>> On Thursday, 23 August 2018 at 06:34:04 UTC, Shachar Shemesh 
>> wrote:
>>> On 23/08/18 09:17, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
>>>> I don't see why we just can't add support for scoped lazy 
>>>> parameters. It's already in the language just with a 
>>>> different syntax (delegates). That would probably be an easy 
>>>> fix (last famous words :)). I guess it would be better if it 
>>>> could be inferred.
>>>
>>> Here's the interesting question, though: is this *going* to 
>>> happen?
>>>
>>> We've known about this problem for ages now. No movement.
>>>
>> It's on my todo list, however I've instead been doomed to work 
>> on higher priority things.
>>
>> More generally though, some time should be spent on trying out 
>> things in the spirit of "will it blend" just to see what 
>> happens.
>>  Putting effort towards having a more homogeneous environment 
>> in the language should in the long run pay its dividends.
>
> Is there even any way to escape a lazy? If no, then lazy is 
> identical to scope lazy.
> E.g. https://run.dlang.io/is fails to compile

Link not found. I assume you tried something like returning a 
delegate that references a lazy parameter?