Is it a bug that a parent class that access its own private members from derived classes gets deprecation warning?

[Elie Morisse]

On Monday, 11 June 2018 at 15:41:57 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer 
wrote:
> I filed a bug about a similar thing (calling private functions 
> instead of using private variables), but it seemed to be agreed 
> upon that this is expected behavior:
>
> https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15897
>
> You may find some more insight from reading that discussion. I 
> don't agree with the conclusion, as it is very surprising 
> behavior to me.
>
> -Steve

Not the same, bauss' case is a template method that wouldn't get 
the depreciation warning if it wasn't templated. Template 
instances not always having the same access privileges as their 
template declaration's is definitely a bug.