Propose to replace cyclic dependency error msg

[H. S. Teoh]

On Thu, Dec 06, 2018 at 01:43:53PM -0500, Steven Schveighoffer via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> On 12/6/18 1:36 PM, H. S. Teoh wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 06, 2018 at 05:03:08PM +0000, Denis Feklushkin via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> > > Hi!
> > > 
> > > Just want to propose to replace compiler message from:
> > > 
> > > "Cyclic dependency between module xxx and yyy"
> > > 
> > > by
> > > 
> > > "Cyclic dependency between module ctors/dtors xxx and yyy"
> > > 
> > > Several times faced with the fact that people do not understand that
> > > compiler talking about constructors and they try to solve the
> > > nonexistent problem of looped import.
> > 
> > Excellent proposal!  I filed a bug for this:
> > 
> > 	https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19468
> > 
> > 
> 
> Is there really a compiler message that says this? I thought all the
> cyclic dependency checking is done at runtime?
[...]

Argh, you're right. I should've checked before filing the bug. :D

In any case, it's a trivial fix:

	https://github.com/dlang/druntime/pull/2397


T

-- 
I am a consultant. My job is to make your job redundant. -- Mr Tom