What do you thing about this string interpolation idea
Steven Schveighoffer
schveiguy at gmail.com
Mon Dec 10 16:27:03 UTC 2018
On 12/10/18 11:11 AM, aliak wrote:
> This is much better than having to mixin everywhere. A couple of things:
>
> 1) Can this be put in a module so that you don't have to
> mixin(enableInterpolation) but instead "import interp =
> std.interpolation;" or something similar?
No, you need a local mixin. Doing that import just imports the *symbol*
into your namespace, but it doesn't give access to your namespace to the
symbol.
> 2) This would unfortunately pollute the namespace and in code that uses
> interpolation heavily, you'd have to rename it to something non-clashy
> which I can see being quite annoying and a maintenance burden if it
> turns out to be a common thing to do. Maybe if it's just standardly
> called "interp" it may be alright though.
We can pass in the name we want to avoid conflicts.
So something like:
import std.interpolation;
mixin(enableInterpolate!"interp");
interp!("$a").writeln;
-Steve
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list