named arguments (C++) - Something D could learn from

[JN]

On Friday, 14 December 2018 at 20:13:42 UTC, bauss wrote:
> I still think named arguments should be something to consider 
> implementing for D, but since everything requires a DIP and 
> it's very hard to write a DIP that's proper for such a thing 
> then I guess it'll just be a dream, forever.

Even if a DIP would happen, people would just say it's 
unnecessary/bloat/can be done as a library function through some 
ugly mixin :/