Why can't we derive struct's?
Walter Bright
newshound2 at digitalmars.com
Fri Dec 21 21:46:45 UTC 2018
On 12/21/2018 11:08 AM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
>> The issues I've seen in bugzilla are how alias this overrides default expected
> behavior of classes. In other words, if you have a base class and want to cast
> it to a derived, and the base class has an alias this, it stupidly tries the
> alias this, and won't even consider a dynamic cast.
>
> It's not madness so much as poor implementation. Saying there are bugs in the
> alias this implementation is not the same as saying the feature is problematic.
> All that is needed is a good definition of what takes precedence -- we already
> have that, it's just not implemented properly.
The ones I reviewed do not have easy answers as to what the correct behavior
"ought" to be, and it certainly is not spec'ed in the specification.
> But MI is not multiple alias-this.
It fundamentally is. (Though I agree it doesn't have the virtual base "diamond
inheritance" issue.)
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list