A betterC base

[Rubn]

On Thursday, 8 February 2018 at 18:06:38 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
> I.e. it isn't an issue of us D guys being dumb about the GC.

So you could say it's a design flaw of D, attempting to use a GC 
where it isn't suited?

>> If going malloc didnt lose you a bunch of features and bring a 
>> bunch of other stuff you need to be careful of, that might be 
>> a good argument too.
>
> With @nogc, you don't have to be careful about it. The compiler 
> will let you know.

@nogc has issues integrating with features like delegates, but no 
one seems to care about that with statements like this. It's more 
convenient to not use @nogc than dealing with the hassles of 
using it.