Anybody still using the chm docs

[Seb]

On Saturday, 24 February 2018 at 11:23:17 UTC, notna wrote:
> On Thursday, 16 June 2016 at 02:32:05 UTC, Jack Stouffer wrote:
>> On Wednesday, 15 June 2016 at 10:58:04 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
>>> So I'm wondering if in 2016 someone really needs an offline 
>>> copy of a website shipped with a binary release?
>>
>> For offline browsing, Windows and Linux users can use Zeal [1] 
>> which is FOSS, and macOS users can use Dash[2], which is free 
>> as in beer. Both of which can use this D docset [3].
>>
>> So no, there's no reason to maintain the chm docs.
>>
>> [1] https://zealdocs.org/
>> [2] https://kapeli.com/dash
>> [3] 
>> https://github.com/Kapeli/Dash-User-Contributions/tree/master/docsets/D#readme
>
> thanks... great community... everyday something new to learn... 
> even in 2+ years old posts ;)

FYI: devdocs.io (works in every browser + offers optional offline 
access via HTML5 localStorage) supports D too:

http://devdocs.io/d/