Tuple DIP

[jmh530]

On Tuesday, 16 January 2018 at 21:21:04 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
>
> My thoughts were:
> http://forum.dlang.org/post/p3e4al$1jfc$1@digitalmars.com

A starting point could be an unnamed tuple built-in tuple type, 
but also not yet deprecating the built-in named tuple type in 
std.typecons.

>
> But as it has been requested more than once and it is a feature 
> of existing Phobos tuples, I can add a proposal to the DIP that 
> can be accepted/rejected independently, and add a few words to 
> the "limitations" section.

Sometimes when you give someone the option to agree or disagree 
to a bunch of different choices it's harder to come to agreement 
than if you keep things simple.