String Switch Lowering

[Walter Bright]

On 1/25/2018 10:21 AM, Benjamin Thaut wrote:
> So I was thinking to myself: Is it really a good idea to lower string switches 
> to a template if it results in such symbols? This symbol alone takes 17815 Bytes.
> 
> If we think this is a good idea, should we rewrite this particular string switch 
> to use a associative array instead to avoid the overly long symbol name?

This clearly should be in bugzilla.