Quora: Why hasn't D started to replace C++?

Daniel Kozak kozzi11 at gmail.com
Tue Jan 30 21:43:45 UTC 2018


Thats not completly true, last time I tried some of best c++ version from
http://benchmarksgame.alioth.debian.org/. I was able to write much
idiomatic D code which was faster than c++ witch use some specific
libraries and so on. So my experience is that D is same or faster than C++

On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 10:26 PM, Ola Fosheim Grøstad via Digitalmars-d <
digitalmars-d at puremagic.com> wrote:

> On Tuesday, 30 January 2018 at 21:02:13 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 03:45:44PM -0500, Andrei Alexandrescu via
>> Digitalmars-d wrote:
>>
>>> https://www.quora.com/Why-hasnt-D-started-to-replace-C++
>>>
>> [...]
>>
>> I actually agree with all of his points, except one: C++'s "enormous
>> performance advantage"?!  Is he being serious?  Or is his view biased by
>> dmd's, erm, shall we say, "suboptimal" optimizer?
>>
>
> Well, I understand what you mean, but there are more performance related
> options for C++ than for any other language at the moment. I don't use
> them, most people don't, but they exist. So for people that care a lot
> about throughput there basically is no other "complete" alternative...
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puremagic.com/pipermail/digitalmars-d/attachments/20180130/24dd2003/attachment.html>


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list