Is package.d a good idea?
Yuxuan Shui
yshuiv7 at gmail.com
Sun Jul 1 11:36:51 UTC 2018
In Rust, they have something call mod.rs, which is very similar
to package.d. When you use a module 'foo' in Rust, it can either
be 'foo.rs' or 'foo/mod.rs'. If 'foo' has sub-modules, it has to
be 'foo/mod.rs'.
Now in the Rust 2018 edition, they are getting rid of mod.rs. So
when you import 'foo', rustc will always look for 'foo.rs', and
if 'foo' has submodules, it can still reside in
'foo/submodule.rs'.
This makes me think if package.d is a good idea, and if we should
try to get rid of it as well.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list