Alternative destructors, do/should we have them?

Andrea Fontana nospam at example.com
Thu Jul 5 15:58:14 UTC 2018


On Thursday, 5 July 2018 at 10:57:51 UTC, Dukc wrote:
> If not, should we in your opinion have an ability to define an 
> alternative destructor which runs only when explicitly 
> requested?

What does "when explicity requested" mean?


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list