How about implementing SPMD on SIMD for D?

[Guillaume Piolat]

On Sunday, 8 July 2018 at 19:07:57 UTC, Random D user wrote:
>
> In my experience, you can only get the real benefits out of 
> SIMD if you carefully handcraft your hot loops to fully use it. 
> Sprinkling some SIMD here and there with a SIMD vector type, 
> doesn't really seem to yield big benefits.
>

I agree. That's why it's useful to have a (stable) syntax for 
such instruction like PMADDWD that can't be described with just 
operator overloading.