Should I write a DIP for Null functions?
Seb
seb at wilzba.ch
Wed Jul 11 03:40:12 UTC 2018
On Wednesday, 11 July 2018 at 02:20:01 UTC, 12345swordy wrote:
> I was think about about writing one about this as this is an
> "obvious" small easy feature to introduce as it practically a
> function that does nothing when called and that itself is quite
> useful.
>
> Any objections to this?
>
> Alexander
I think you will only find objections once you dive into the
topic and actually write the DIP.
I don't think anyone will object to you experimenting with this.
Go for it!
That being said, it certainly won't hurt to post a draft version
of your DIP here, s.t. people have a better understanding to what
they will object/agree to.
Also I would recommend to highlight in your DIP use cases and why
a library solution based on mixin is inferior.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list