Copy Constructor DIP

[Manu]

On Fri, 13 Jul 2018 at 10:35, Atila Neves via Digitalmars-d
<digitalmars-d at puremagic.com> wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> Now that I understand the implicit call `@implicit` makes sense
> to me but I'm convinced it'll confuse more people than not. I'll
> see if I can come up with a better name.

You don't find 'implicit' satisfactory as an obvious and intuitive
complement to 'explicit' in C++?
I think the name's perfect, but I need to know it works in general to
find it acceptable.
As a marker used in this one case, it's a terrible name, as a
generalised concept, it's perfect.