Copy Constructor DIP

[Manu]

On Sat., 14 Jul. 2018, 2:00 am rikki cattermole via Digitalmars-d, <
digitalmars-d at puremagic.com> wrote:

> On 14/07/2018 1:04 PM, Manu wrote:
> > Determining that requires at least a cursory exploration.
>
> Given how many of us are objecting to the syntax, I'm going to place
> this requirement upon a 'yes' answer by me. That an attempt is made for
> an alternative syntax discussion. It's a fair request I think.
>

I just want to reiterate again, I'm not seeking alternative syntax, I just
want to know that proposed syntax can work broadly, or if there are any
challenges or problems that would restrict it from broad application.

>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puremagic.com/pipermail/digitalmars-d/attachments/20180714/8a465578/attachment.html>