Struct Initialization syntax

[Luís Marques]

On Monday, 23 July 2018 at 16:26:42 UTC, Seb wrote:
> Hence, I'm leaning forward to proposing Option 1 as the 
> recommended Option for the DIP (that's also what the PoC DMD PR 
> implements). What's your take on this?

Although a bit more verbose that seems like a good choice. If you 
could save the “initialization list” in an enum that choice also 
seems to generalize better. Not conflicting with named arguments 
is important for me, as named arguments would be very nice to 
have for hardware description kind of stuff.