An (old/new?) pattern to utilize phobos better with @nogc

[Dukc]

On Sunday, 17 June 2018 at 13:50:31 UTC, Seb wrote:
> On Saturday, 16 June 2018 at 11:58:47 UTC, Dukc wrote:
>>
>> What are your thoughts? Do you agree with this coding pattern?
>
> It would even be better if map can recognize tuples and thus 
> allows to simply use a lambda functions with two parameters, 
> but in the past with a few exceptions there hasn't been much 
> support/consensus on specializing Phobos functions for tuples.

Yes, I agree. And each too, of course.