dip1000 state

Manu turkeyman at gmail.com
Sat Mar 3 06:48:41 UTC 2018


On 2 March 2018 at 10:07, carblue via Digitalmars-d
<digitalmars-d at puremagic.com> wrote:
> On Thursday, 22 February 2018 at 14:36:10 UTC, Radu wrote:
>>
>> Whould like to know what's the state of dip1000?
>
>
> The fact that it takes 8 days for any reply, doesn't that say something?
> @safe is a high ranked technical issue in vision papers (in german we say
> something like "paper is patient"), but when trying to turn to reality and
> push forward dip1000 for phobos (as I did in the past ~1.5 month), only a
> few members like Seb really seem to care a lot.

I've been arguing for DIP1000 (or something very much like it) for
almost 10 years. It's one of the small handful of issues that lead me
to the forum in the first place.
'Patience' might not be the right word at this point ;)


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list