#dbugfix 17592

[Adam D. Ruppe]

On Wednesday, 21 March 2018 at 19:21:15 UTC, 12345swordy wrote:
> That seems to be it's own separate problem, as it involves 
> generating dynamic types at run-time, which it needs run-time 
> equivalent of attribute checking.

But @nogc is a compile time thing, meaning it cannot work here.

> My example assumes that the classes created are static types 
> not dynamic types. Besides I do not like implied conversions 
> when it comes classes, as I believe it is a horrible idea.

All classes are dynamic types, this is their reason for existing!