#dbugfix 17592

[12345swordy]

On Thursday, 22 March 2018 at 17:02:43 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
> On Thursday, 22 March 2018 at 14:48:04 UTC, 12345swordy wrote:
>> That is not a runtime version of system/user attributes! That 
>> is custom checking for destructor! Hardly the same.
>
> How would your idea work?

I thought it was your idea.

> Classes in fact do not work with -betterC. 
> https://dlang.org/spec/betterc.html#consequences

"C++ classes and COM classes will still work"
https://dlang.org/blog/2017/08/23/d-as-a-better-c/
A bit misleading in that statement. It should be "D Classes".


> Warning: your code is fundamentally broken and cannot work the 
> way you want it to work.

I can tell that you're being snarky at me.