#dbugfix 17592

[jmh530]

On Friday, 23 March 2018 at 21:55:52 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> [snip]
>
> Walter and Andrei have been discussing putting together a DIP 
> with a "ProtoObject" which will be the new root class below 
> Object where ProtoObject itself has only the bare minimum 
> required to work as a class (not monitor object, no toString, 
> no opEquals, etc.). Classes could then derive from ProtoObject 
> directly instead of from Object, and then they could define any 
> of the functions that are currently on Object with whatever 
> attributes they wanted (or not define them at all). The DIP has 
> not yet been written, and the details still need to be ironed 
> out, but that's the gist of the direction that's currently 
> being considered.
>
> - Jonathan M Davis

Object would derive from ProtoObject, right?