CTFE ^^ (pow)

[Walter Bright]

On 3/24/2018 9:37 AM, Manu wrote:
> I'm not sure why I seem to have to defend the idea that it's a *great
> thing* that D (in theory; according to the advertising brochure) does
> away with these requirements.

It is indeed a great idea. I'm just making the case that it isn't a blocker to 
not have it. It's inconvenient.

It's like you can code anything in C, even OOP. It's just inconvenient, tedious, 
and error-prone to.