D mentioned in Infoworld

[Chris]

On Tuesday, 27 March 2018 at 12:17:44 UTC, bauss wrote:

>
> Yes I agree it's great that D is talked about.
>
> I just feel like someone is dropping salt into my coffee when 
> it's misinterpreted.
>
> I hope one day all the legacy, non-relevant issues D had will 
> cease to exist and that it will be looked upon what it is 
> __today__ instead of what it was in the __past__

I know. But this will take time, and it will happen in the end, 
if the D community keeps up the good work. Nothing beats 
tenacicty. And if you look at the companies using D, these are 
facts that cannot be ignored forever (e.g. Funkwerk 
http://www.funkwerk.com/en/). If articles like that annoy you, 
I'd say you either write to them or if there's a section for 
comments, set the record straight right below the article to the 
readers' benefit.