rvalues -> ref (yup... again!)
H. S. Teoh
hsteoh at quickfur.ath.cx
Tue Mar 27 20:38:35 UTC 2018
On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 08:25:36PM +0000, Rubn via Digitalmars-d wrote:
[...]
> _D7example__T3fooTSQr3FooZQnFNbNiNfQrZv:
> push rbp
> mov rbp, rsp
> sub rsp, 3104
> lea rax, [rbp + 16]
> lea rdi, [rbp - 2048]
> lea rcx, [rbp - 1024]
> mov edx, 1024
> mov rsi, rcx
> mov qword ptr [rbp - 2056], rdi
> mov rdi, rsi
> mov rsi, rax
> mov qword ptr [rbp - 2064], rcx
> call memcpy at PLT <--------------------- hidden copy
[...]
Is this generated by dmd, or gdc/ldc?
Generally, when it comes to performance issues, I don't even bother
looking at dmd-generated code anymore. If the extra copying is still
happening with gdc -O2 / ldc -O, then you have a point. Otherwise, it
doesn't really say very much.
T
--
People tell me that I'm skeptical, but I don't believe them.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list