auto: useful, annoying or bad practice?
Mark
smarksc at gmail.com
Wed May 2 21:37:26 UTC 2018
On Wednesday, 2 May 2018 at 14:05:49 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
> How else would you do DoI, though? With Concepts? The
> advantage of using structural typing over concepts for DoI is
> that you would need an exponential number of concepts to catch
> up with a linear number of optional fields in a structural
> typing model. Sure, structural typing has its warts, but it's
> at least more scalable in this respect.
>
>
> T
Why? I don't think concepts force you to write a specific
implementation for every possible combination of compile-time
values.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list