Sealed classes - would you want them in D?

[KingJoffrey]

On Friday, 11 May 2018 at 03:32:25 UTC, Uknown wrote:
>
> `private` is for outside the module. Within the module, private 
> is not applied because D wanted to avoid C++'s `friend` 
> functions.

'private' is "meant" to be part of the implementation of 'the 
class'.

Whereas D makes it part of the implementation of 'the module' ( 
which is an even higher level of abstraction).

This is an abomination!

A class should have the capacity to protect its 
attributes/methods - even from the module.