Sealed classes - would you want them in D?

[KingJoffrey]

On Wednesday, 16 May 2018 at 03:52:43 UTC, Uknown wrote:
>
> One is expected to know the tool they are using. There is 
> nothing elitist about that.
>

That is a pathetic, and yet another elitist view.

If programmers never programmed until they 'understood the tool', 
there would not be 20+ million programmers in the world.

How many C++ programmers understand C++ (let alone have read the 
spec).

The same can be asked for pretty much any other language.

Learning is still a gradual process - except for elitists it 
seems, who expect you to know everything up front.

> There is no if. You know what the stop sign means because 
> someone told you what it means. private means it is only 
> available to the module. It is entirely the fault of the user 
> for not reading the docs.
>

Another elitist view.

>
> Its actively being improved, but in this case it was more than 
> adequate. The spec was pretty clear that private applies to 
> modules.

I disagree.