Sealed classes - would you want them in D? (v2)

[0xEAB]

On Thursday, 17 May 2018 at 10:34:18 UTC, Zoadian wrote:
> If class level protection is added, please do not call it 
> sealed.
> People from c++ might be suprised by 'private' already. We do 
> not have to confuse those c#ies too.

I thought the same.


> Module level protection is enough to hide implementation 
> details though. So while i do understand why you want this in 
> D, i don't think it is worth it to complicate the language for 
> something you can work around easily by putting the classes in 
> their own modules.

I wouldn't consider putting classes into own modules a 
workaround. In my opinion it's more or less the solution.