Error about constructor calls in loops/labels, but there are no loops and labels?

[Yuxuan Shui]

On Sunday, 20 May 2018 at 00:05:39 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> because it tends to become very difficult to get right in all 
> cases and results in situations where the programmer is forced 
> to do something in order to make the compiler shut up

Well, doesn't this post show exactly this problem, and that's 
because the compiler is too dumb?

Making the compiler smarter will only decrease the number of 
these cases.