Rebasing of PRs

[Rubn]

On Friday, 9 November 2018 at 09:49:39 UTC, Nicholas Wilson wrote:
> Some of you may have noticed that I have been merging a lot of 
> Old PRs recently.
>
> Due to some old CI bugs and other bitrot and PRs merged, many 
> outstanding PRs need a rebase.
>
> If you have an open PR in dmd or druntime marked `needs rebase` 
> (if they're really old it may be better to close it and open a 
> new one, it will be a long time before the CI gets to it) or a 
> dlang.org PR that is not green, please do me a favour and 
> rebase it and ping me when you do.
>
> Many Thanks
> Nic

I made a PR once, it sat long enough that it needed a rebase, 
which I did. Then it sat so long again that it needed another 
one. I lost interest as a result of dlang's lack of interest and 
now I'm pretty sure it's one of those that needs a rebase again. 
Why the fuck should I or anyone else bother? It's a mess that was 
created due to lack of management. And certain individuals refuse 
to acknowledge said issue as they pull up stats on how many pull 
requests get merged in (basically just the ones that the dlang 
team merge on their own due to their connections).