Rebasing of PRs

[Nicholas Wilson]

On Sunday, 11 November 2018 at 01:13:51 UTC, Rubn wrote:
> I made a PR once, it sat long enough that it needed a rebase, 
> which I did. Then it sat so long again that it needed another 
> one. I lost interest as a result of dlang's lack of interest 
> and now I'm pretty sure it's one of those that needs a rebase 
> again.

Which PR(s)? That doesn't give me a lot to try and find it. PR# + 
repo name would help a lot.

>Why the fuck should I or anyone else bother? It's a mess
> that was created due to lack of management.

Aye. But I am now the Pull Request manager[1], so things are 
moving forward.

> And certain individuals refuse to acknowledge said issue as 
> they pull up stats on how many pull requests get merged in 
> (basically just the ones that the dlang team merge on their own 
> due to their connections).

I'm not denying we have a problem with rotting PRs, but I have 
merged a large number of PRs over the last few days and will 
continue to do so. Yes there are still lots to go, but they can't 
all be merged at once (not the least of which is that the CIs are 
not that fast), but I do very much hope to get there.

[1]:https://forum.dlang.org/thread/swsfgggaawgylauuzjlm@forum.dlang.org