Mobile is the new PC and AArch64 is the new x64
Joakim
dlang at joakim.fea.st
Tue Nov 13 23:20:08 UTC 2018
On Tuesday, 13 November 2018 at 22:39:34 UTC, kinke wrote:
> On Tuesday, 13 November 2018 at 17:41:31 UTC, Joakim wrote:
>> No, benchmarks show the mobile i7 in last year's MBP as faster
>> than your old desktop core i5, so the iPad Pro is faster than
>> your desktop. :P Of course, the TDP of your desktop i5 is
>> twice the mobile i7 and almost 10 times the A12X in the new
>> iPad Pro, so Apple completely blows away Intel on the
>> performance-to-power-dissipation ratio.
>
> While the last statement may hold some truth, I sure as hell
> don't trust Geekbench numbers. And all ARM/x86 comparisons seem
> to be based on that one little, highly controversial benchmark
> suite.
>
> Their multicore results suggest a Ryzen 1950X outperforms an i7
> 7700K by only 50%. A small testsuite of 8 real-world apps
> (incl. raytracing, video encoding, compression) shows a min
> gain of 80% and max gain of 200%, definitely averaging above
> 100%:
> https://www.computerbase.de/2018-08/amd-ryzen-threadripper-2990wx-2950x-test/2/#diagramm-blender-280
> As with any benchmark, your milage may vary, but a dedicated
> multicore score apparently not scaling well at all makes me
> wonder.
These broad benchmarks are indicative, but the best is obviously
to try it out with your own software.
> Unless someone gives me hard numbers that their phone/tablet
> can compile something like LLVM/LDC in a time anywhere near
> their desktop CPU, I don't waste a second believing that a ~5W
> CPU can match a 65+ W desktop one, even a 5-years old one like
> mine. Laptops would surely already be shipping with these chips
> if that was the case.
As my first post notes, 64-bit ARM laptops are now shipping and
more are on the way:
https://www.anandtech.com/show/13498/samsung-unveils-galaxy-book2-12inch-snapdragon-850-with-x20-lte-20-hrs
https://wccftech.com/snapdragon-8180-new-details-octacore-soc/
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list