Question from Bison's maintainer on the D backend
SeeWebsiteForEmail at erdani.org
Sun Nov 18 15:56:47 UTC 2018
Hello, Akim Demaille, the maintainer of the famed GNU Bison parser
generator, reached out to me with the following (published with his accord):
I’m the maintainer of GNU Bison, which is a parser generator for C/C++
and Java. A few years ago someone contributed a D backend for Bison,
but at that time, the investment in Bison was low. Now I’m spending
time on it, and Richard Stallman asked me to contact the « D community »
to know whether there would be interest for such a backend.
Bison is a LALR(1), LR(1), IELR(1) and GLR parser generator. It’s based
on ye olde yacc, by it features several interesting properties.
Of course the D world already features several parser generators, some
being even embedded in the language and benefiting from compile time
function evaluation. So it’s very unclear to me if Bison would get some
What would you think about that?
I wrote back that Bison is currently much more sophisticated than the
present alternatives in the D community, and that we'd be interested in
continued maintenance of the D backend for Bison. Further discussion
I would say that my first and foremost worry would be to integrate
something which is not used, and not maintained. And I am not a D
programmer, so I would not be able to decide whether his work was good
or not, have it evolve with Bison and releases of D.
Also, something that somewhat worries me is that the D parser was based
on the Java parser, not the C++ one.
More thoughts and reports from the community would be helpful. If you
are a current or former Bison user with the D backend, or if you have an
interest in contributing reviews and patches for it, please chime in.
More information about the Digitalmars-d