Why isn't dip1000 fully implemented yet?

Neia Neutuladh neia at ikeran.org
Thu Nov 22 16:35:15 UTC 2018


On Thu, 22 Nov 2018 12:32:30 +0000, Nicholas Wilson wrote:
> On Thursday, 22 November 2018 at 11:55:14 UTC, Daniel N wrote:
>> "impossible to review" is a very strong statement, how then were you
>> able to write the spec?
> 
> I guessed, well, I wrote it the way I think what he has done ought to
> work.
> Hence why Walter needs to review it.

In other words, you need the spec PR to demonstrate intent. The most you 
can get from reviewing the dmd PR is that the code does something that 
seems reasonable on the face of it and probably won't blow up in anyone's 
face too much.


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list