shared - i need it to be useful

[Timon Gehr]

On 17.10.2018 09:20, Manu wrote:
>> Timon Gehr has done a good job showing that they still stand
>> unbreached.
> His last comment was applied to a different proposal.
> His only comment on this thread wasn't in response to the proposal in
> this thread.
> If you nominate Timon as your proxy, then he needs to destroy my
> proposal, or at least comment on it, rather than make some prejudiced
> comment generally.
> 

There is no "prejudice", just reasoning. Your proposal was "disallow 
member access on shared aggregates, allow implicit conversion from 
unshared to shared and keep everything else the same". This is a bad 
proposal. There may be a good proposal that allows the things you want, 
but you have not stated what they are, your OP was just: "look at this 
bad proposal, it might work, no?" I said no, then was met with some 
hostility.

You should focus on finding a good proposal that achieves what you want 
without breaking the type system instead of attacking me.