Protected package?

[Steven Schveighoffer]

On 10/25/18 12:45 PM, 12345swordy wrote:
> On Wednesday, 24 October 2018 at 23:36:56 UTC, 12345swordy wrote:
>> It says here that:
>> "package extends private so that package members can be accessed from 
>> code in other modules that are in the same package. If no identifier 
>> is provided, this applies to the innermost package only, or defaults 
>> to private if a module is not nested in a package."
>>
>> Can this be extended to the protected visibility attribute?
>> If not, then does it need an DIP to do so?
>>
> 
> Well I don't think there no harm of doing so.

Sorry, I'm not sure what the question is.

What is "this" and how is it being extended to protected?

FYI, I didn't know that you could package something to a specific 
identifier, interesting.

-Steve