Protected package?

[12345swordy]

On Thursday, 25 October 2018 at 19:48:43 UTC, Steven 
Schveighoffer wrote:
> On 10/25/18 12:45 PM, 12345swordy wrote:
>> On Wednesday, 24 October 2018 at 23:36:56 UTC, 12345swordy 
>> wrote:
>>> It says here that:
>>> "package extends private so that package members can be 
>>> accessed from code in other modules that are in the same 
>>> package. If no identifier is provided, this applies to the 
>>> innermost package only, or defaults to private if a module is 
>>> not nested in a package."
>>>
>>> Can this be extended to the protected visibility attribute?
>>> If not, then does it need an DIP to do so?
>>>
>> 
>> Well I don't think there no harm of doing so.
>
> Sorry, I'm not sure what the question is.
>
> What is "this" and how is it being extended to protected?
>
> FYI, I didn't know that you could package something to a 
> specific identifier, interesting.
>
> -Steve

The package visibility attribute. It is an extension of private, 
which means that it is not inheritable.