Random thought: Alternative stuct

[Kagamin]

On Tuesday, 4 September 2018 at 06:32:02 UTC, rikki cattermole 
wrote:
>> If D didn't have built-in OOP features already, it'd be an 
>> interesting question, but given that it does, I think getting 
>> rid of them is a clear net-negative.
>
> You also loose loads of stuff like extern(C++) classes interop 
> and COM. Definitely a net negative. Even with a concept like 
> signatures, you just can't replace the class/interface system.

Even in betterC? Last I checked classes pulled TypeInfos and all 
the stuff. What's the problem to use COM without classes? I do it.