This is why I don't use D.

[Everlast]

On Wednesday, 5 September 2018 at 01:39:04 UTC, Paul Backus wrote:
> On Wednesday, 5 September 2018 at 00:49:36 UTC, Everlast wrote:
>> There is really no incentive for me to use D except for it's 
>> language features... everything else it does, besides 
>> performance, is shit compared to what most other languages do. 
>> Really, D wins on very few metrics but the D fanboys will only 
>> focus on those.
>>
>>
>> If D wants to survive it better get people willing to help it, 
>> making their lives more difficult when there are far better 
>> options out there will only starve D of what it 
>> needs(investing). All those that think D is just fine, you are 
>> cutting your own throats... Eventually D will become defunct 
>> and you'll have to move on. Might be 10 years, 20 years, 30 
>> years... but when Walter and Andrew are done with D in a few 
>> years there will be no one who will keep it alive(maybe a fork 
>> will occur but doubtful it would get anywhere).
>
> If you don't want to use D, then don't use D. No one is holding 
> a gun to your head.
>
> It seems to me like what D needs, right now, is people who are 
> willing to roll up their sleeves and get to work when they see 
> something that needs fixing. If that's something you're either 
> unable or unwilling to do, for whatever reason, then D probably 
> isn't a good choice for you right now. And that's ok. We all 
> have our own goals and priorities, and no single programming 
> language is going to be a perfect fit for everybody.


I'm not going to sit here and spend have my time fixing shit that 
should have never broke in the first place.

Thanks, you've made a great decision for me, I'm not longer using 
D for anything. The only reason I used it was for it's binary 
support and meta programming... no longer. Screw performance, non 
one else really cares and one doesn't necessarily need meta 
programming.

Thanks, see you in another life!