Static foreach bug?

[JN]

On Wednesday, 5 September 2018 at 12:41:05 UTC, Andre Pany wrote:
> On Wednesday, 5 September 2018 at 12:05:59 UTC, rikki 
> cattermole wrote:
>
>> Indeed. scope enum would make much more sense.
>
> scope enum sounds a lot better for me than static enum or even 
> __local. The __ words looks a little bit like compiler magic as 
> the __ words are reserved for the compiler.
>
> Kind regards
> Andre

To be honest, using enum as "compile-time variable" is magic 
enough. Enum should be reserved for enumerations. But I guess 
it's one of those things that is too late to change.