Source changes should include date of change

[krzaq]

On Sunday, 9 September 2018 at 01:27:06 UTC, Josphe Brigmo wrote:
> This has nothing to do with git. People think git is the end 
> all be all. What if git is not available, then what? It's 
> moronic to think that one has to use one or the other when both 
> options are available and both only add information.
>

What do you mean by "git not being available"? The program? 
You'll sooner have git on a system than a compiler. The 
repository? Then the same argument can be said for the sources. 
And if you say mirror, so will I.