DIP 1020--Named Parameters--Community Review Round 1

[Robert M. Münch]

> ... this DIP does not allow arguments to be reordered. The primary aim 
> of this proposal is to aid in readability and the implementation of 
> tooling.

I don't see any value in the DIP, what do I gain? I can't re-order 
arguments, which would IMO be THE use-case for named parameters.

Aid in readability by adding more syntax is counter productive. It 
lowers readability. I can add a comment where apropriate if necessary.

Without a strong use-case and a clear argumentation about the benefits 
over current options, it is totally unclear why the DIP is necessary.

-- 
Robert M. Münch
http://www.saphirion.com
smarter | better | faster